So I posted last week about how the book Diary of a Wimpy Kid is going to be made into a movie. I never really gave this book much thought as it is not my cup of tea, but I realize that about every single teen/pre-teen has probably read this book and or series. I received a comment about my post(which you can read if you scroll down) that read as follows
Aaron Mead said...
Here's what I think about the book. If the movie is true-to-book at all, you can extrapolate my movie review...
While I agree that this is a funny book, I'm actually pretty worried about it as something that shapes the character of children. The central problem is that Kinney has us laughing at—and so wanting more of, and implicitly approving of—the mean things Heffley says and does, and his self-serving attitudes. The question is, should tweens—whose moral character is in relatively early stages of formation—be laughing at these things? My worry here is that the book just reinforces, and subtly leads us to approve of, a certain self-centered negativity that ought to be purged of pre-teens, not anchored all the more deeply via repeated and pleasurable reinforcement.
Okay, okay, I hear the objections already: “Isn’t this just puritanical paranoia? What’s wrong with a little frivolous fun? Couldn’t the book just be like junk food, i.e., okay once in while but not as one’s steady diet?” Reply: there is nothing wrong with frivolous fun. The problem is, reading books like this isn’t frivolous fun. Think of it this way: as a parent, would you like your son to be best friends with Greg Heffley? My answer is clearly, “No.” Why? Because our friends influence who we become, the choices we make, the attitudes we take—in short, our character—and I do not want my kids to have Heffley’s character. And I don’t think it is a reach to say that the characters in books we enjoy become our friends for a season—and perhaps for a long and influential season if the book is one in a series. (Hence the disanalogy with junk food: if you buy this book for your kids, they will “eat” it all the time.) Indeed, I know people who have become more emotionally attached to fictional characters than they are to the real people in their lives. So, while it is funny, I think we also need to consider whether it is good for children.
Final objection: “This book can help non-readers—particularly boys—to become readers.” While I agree that non-readers may well read Diary of a Wimpy Kid, the question is, what exactly does that accomplish? I’m skeptical that such a book is going to help any child graduate to literature that is actually worth reading. By my lights, this book is no better than a funny but corrosive TV show in that respect (though it is considerably more creative than most TV shows). If we want to help non-readers to become readers—an extremely worthwhile goal—we need to do better than Diary of a Wimpy Kid.
February 27, 2010 11:58 AM
In which I posted a reply
Mr. Maurer said...
You hit upon some very excellent and insight points to consider. As a teacher and "role model" for middle school students I have to be careful what I say,do,promote,etc. in the eyes of my students. I agree with you on all of your points and actually you have me thinking in a whole new perspective on what I share and books that I booktalk. I took into consideration your point about would we want our own children to hang out with this kid and I instantly thought no way. I usually think of books as an outlet to read for fun or to work on reading skills. This book series is all over my building with reluctant and struggling readers. I cannot help but think of your final point that will this book help them move to the next level of literature. Probably not, but with some students I can't help but think something is better than nothing. Thank you for such an insightful comment. I will have to address some of your points in a separate post because I think this dialogue needs to continue.
I am really reevaluating my approach to the books I promote and how I review. I cannot stop thinking about some of these issues. I would like to begin a discussion about this topic so please post some comments down below and see where this takes us. I hope some students respond so we can hear from both sides. Here is a link the site of Aaron Mead where you can read more.